To save annotations, please add this article to your Library
Add to Library
×
Rental expires in
×
Rental expired on
×
Back to Wiley Online Library
Online access to this article has been provided by the nature.com content sharing initiative. What's this?
×
You have this article in your ReadCube library - open that version to get full-text access
Open
×
We are unable to authorize access to this article at this time. Click here to access it on the publisher’s site.
×
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, August, 1996. 10.1046/j.1365-277X.1996.00463.x

Are diets high in non‐milk extrinsic sugars conducive to obesity? An analysis from the Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults

S.A. Gibson

Abstract

Restriction of dietary sugars is often advocated for weight control, alongside a reduced fat and energy intake. This project examined data from the Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults (Gregory et al., 1990) to evaluate the associations between non-milk extrinsic (NME) sugars (as a percentage of food energy) and body mass index (BMI), energy intake and percentage energy from fat. The influence of dieting and potential under reporting on these relationships was also explored. BMI was inversely associated with percentage energy from NME sugars. The relationship was weak, but did not appear to be a mere artifact of dieting and/or under reporting. The well-recognized reciprocal relationship between sugars energy and fat energy was also seen with saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, but not with trans fatty acids. As a result of the sugar : fat see-saw effect only 2% of men and women met the current dietary targets for both fat and NME sugars, suggesting that these may be incompatible on a practical level. These analyses suggest that high (NME) sugar diets appear to be weakly related to leanness rather than obesity, although the relationship is weaker than the inverse association between sugars and fat. It is hypothesized that overweight and diet-restrained individuals often choose to restrict NME sugars: a strategy which can result in a higher (proportional) fat diet and weight gain. Emphasis on reducing NME sugars intakes may be counterproductive to attempts to reduce proportional fat intake and body weight.

Figures

No figures found.

My Notes

You have no notes.

Tip: To annotate, select any text in the article to get the annotation menu. You can add highlights and comments, which will be listed here in this panel.

References

No references found.

Join the millions of researchers who use ReadCube to read, discover, organize and cite.

  • Readcube is a free reference manager, citation tool and Enhanced PDF reader.
  • Sync articles instantly across platforms with ReadCube Desktop, Mobile and Web apps.
  • Stay on top of new literature with personalized recommendations.
  • Enjoy clickable references, linked supplements and annotation tools offline anytime in the ReadCube apps.
Already use ReadCube?
×
View on Wiley Online Library
Journal of Hum an Nutrition and Dietetics (1996), 9, 283292
Are diets high in non-milk extrinsic
sugars conducive to obesity? An
analysis from the Dietary and
Nutritional Survey of British Adults
S. A. Gibson
21 Orchard Road, Burpham , Guildford, Surrey, UK
Restriction of dietary sugars is often advocated for weight control, alongside a
reduced fat and energy intake. This project examined data from the Dietary and
Nutritional Survey of British Adults (Gregory et al., 1990) to evaluate the
associations between non-milk extrinsic (NME) sugars (as a percentage of food
energy) and body mass index (BMI), energy intake and percentage energy from
fat. The influence of dieting and potential under reporting on these relationships
was also explored. BMI was inversely associated with percentage energy from
NME sugars. The relationship was weak, but did not appear to be a mere artifact
of dieting and/or under reporting. The well-recognized reciprocal relationship
between sugars energy and fat energy was also seen with saturated,
monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, but not with trans fatty acids.
As a result of the sugar : fat see-saw effect only 2% of men and women met the
current dietary targets for both fat and NME sugars, suggesting that these may be
incompatible on a practical level. These analyses suggest that high (NME) sugar
diets appear to be weakly related to leanness rather than obesity, although the
relationship is weaker than the inverse association between sugars and fat. It is
hypothesized that overweight and diet-restrained individuals often choose to
restrict NME sugars: a strategy which can result in a higher (proportional) fat diet
and weight gain. Emphasis on reducing NME sugars intakes may be
counterproductive to attempts to reduce proportional fat intake and body weight.
Key words: BMI, obesity, adult dietary survey, non-milk extrinsic sugars, fat, dieting.
Introduction
non-milk extrinsic (NME) sugars, have been
seen as predisposing to overweight by
Obesity is poised to become the most significant
encouraging over-consumption, and their
nutritional problem for the next century. The
restriction is advocated in those who are, or
prevalence of obesity (defined as a body mass
who may become, obese (DHSS, 1989;DoH, 1994).
index (BMI) over 30) is currently estimated at
There is, however, mounting evidence to
13% of men and 15% of women in England
challenge the rationale for NME sugars
(Breeze et al., 1994). Although the aetiology is
restriction. Cross-sectional studies have shown
complex, it is axiomatic that obesity arises from
that there is no evidence of a positive
a previous excess of energy intake over
association between intakes of total or NME
expenditure. Dietary fat, and to a lesser extent
sugars (adjusted for energy) and BMI. Instead,
an inverse relationship is normally found
(Richardson, 1972; Fehily et al., 1984; Gibson,
1993; Bolton-Smith & Woodward, 1994). This
Correspondence: Sigrid Gibson, 21 Orchard
Road, Burpham, Guildford, Surrey, GU4 7JH, UK.
may be partly attributable to sugar avoidance
1996 Blackwell Science Ltd
283
Loading... Authorizing...
Sign up / Log in
Download PDF
Add to Library
In Library
Remove

Add Note
Delete

Add this article to your ReadCube library

This article has been added to your library!

Download ReadCube's free apps to access the Enhanced PDF offline

Shared Annotations

This article was shared with annotations. Would you like to import the shared annotations to your existing annotations?

Import
View my annotations
Download is not allowed for this article.
Saving the PDF outside of ReadCube requires the full PDF purchase option. Rental and Cloud articles can be viewed online and offline in the ReadCube Web, Desktop and Mobile apps but cannot be printed or saved outside of ReadCube.
This article was purchased as a on .
You are viewing a complimentary shared article, since we have detected that you would not normally have full-text access. Complimentary shares do not allow PDF file downloads. Click here for additional access options.

Clickable References and Authors

Inline citations and author names can be clicked to quickly find more information.

skip
next (1/4)

Annotations

Select text to get annotation options, including highlights and comments.

skip
next (2/4)

Article Info and Sharing

Open and close the side panel by clicking any of the buttons:

skip
next (3/4)

Save and Sync

Save this article and your annotations for offline access in the free ReadCube reference manager apps (desktop and mobile).

Plus, get many other features for organizing and citing papers.

finish
Get ReadCube

What did you think of the {feature}?

Thank you for your feedback!

How can the {feature} be improved?

Red exclamation

Your browser does not support the Enhanced PDF